正在打开每日关注
正在打开每日关注
以端到端目标统筹多 Agent 并行执行，覆盖拆解、验证、冲突处理与最终交付。
𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗹 𝗴𝗼𝗮𝗹 i have a few independent tasks to push at once: [task A], [task B], [task C]. for these, set yourself an end-to-end goal: 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗲, until architecture, implementation, tests, review and the final result all clear the bar. split the goal into independent parts, spawn as many parallel agents as it takes to finish faster, and give each agent its own goal with its expected deliverable, verification and done criteria. schedule them in parallel, keep tracking progress, synthesize what comes back, resolve conflicts, keep implementing, verify live after every important step, review when it matters, commit when it's ready, and give a final summary. verification has to cover the real end-to-end path, including browser/computer use, clicks, keyboard, and whatever else it takes. don't stop after partial progress unless you're blocked by missing credentials, destructive ambiguity, or conflicting requirements. → one goal in, 4 agents working in parallel, i only show up when there's a merge conflict.
是什么 这是一条关于多 Agent 研发编排的流程主张：把若干独立任务汇总成一个端到端交付目标，不以“任务已分派”作为完成，而是要求架构、实现、测试、审查和最终结果全部达标。它面向的是希望同时推进多个工作流、又不想亲自充当每个子任务执行者的工程负责人。
核心设计 关键动作有三层：先按独立性拆分工作，再为每个 Agent 明确目标、交付物、验证方式与完成标准；随后并行调度、持续追踪、汇总结果并处理冲突；最后通过真实浏览器或电脑操作验证完整链路，在重要节点复核，准备好后提交。这里的“并行”不是简单增加 Agent 数量，而是把协调协议和质量门槛前置。
关键洞察 它把 Agent 从一次性代码生成器提升为可交付工作的执行单元，也把主 Agent 的职责定义为项目编排、集成判断和验收。真正的效率收益来自减少人工切换与等待，同时保留统一的结果责任。
边界与风险 任务若共享架构、文件或隐含上下文，就未必适合并行；多 Agent 可能重复劳动、产生互相冲突的假设，合并成本会抵消速度收益。浏览器和键盘级验证覆盖面更真实，但也更脆弱、耗时。“不要停止”还需要与凭证缺失、破坏性操作、需求冲突等明确阻塞条件配套，否则容易变成无边界执行。落地时应把依赖、负责人、验收证据和终止条件写进每个子任务契约。